Saturday, August 13, 2005

TC is at it again...

Ahh, TC (explained below) is at it again, still trying to futilely change our minds as to the actual culprit. He posted comments to the rebuttal listed here, and I've posted some additional, but then decided I wanted to make sure others saw what was transpiring in case TC comes to visit you someday. So, below is the comments by TC and my follow up. I will try to leave this as my last word, but I'm only now beginning to realize the rabbit hole TC puts me into with his useless arguments for fear of him striking somewhere else unbeknownst to the owners...

Scottland said...
Jury? evidence? What a load of crap. Circumstancial evidence at best. All artists are proud of their work, but this is another over inflated story from the master. The 'download' in question was certainly not signifncant enough to clog anything, let alone your 17th century plumbing. And the tem 'download', disgusting. Who talks like that anyway? I much prefer 'dropping the kids off at the pool' or even'growing a tail'. Let us not forget 'logoff' and the classic "pinching a loaf.' If proper downloading is not possible at your facility, then an upgrade is in order, sir. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.


darprice said...
Again - can't be 17th century plumbing - the house is only 3 years old - heck, the neighborhood is only 5 years old. While I realize that water restriction toilets can cause you problems (seem to recall you wanting a trip to Canada for the 5 gallon flushers to assure yourself it'd work when necessary), even you have to admit that the toilet was in working order when you started; why else use it and further gum up the plumbing? With this being the case - the suspect list narrows, no matter how you look to defend...

Next - you were proud of your work - why else refer to the culprit as an "artist" as you do above.

Lastly - the final nail - I got the term "download" from you. I believe even your refusal to admit this aspect of your poop loving ways shows your continueing errors and the not 1, not 2, but FOUR different euphemisms you used for this activity. Say what you will, argue your point all you want, but you will not change my mind, nor likely that of many readers TC (Toilet Clogger).

1 comment:

Scottland said...

Touche' sir! You have proven youself a worthy adversary. I willfully acquiesce, to joust another day.